Donald Trump recognizes the legitimate concerns of intelligent Californians of all ethnicity, financial standing, and religion, who are cautioning each other today about the expansion of lawlessness that would exist with a Hillary Clinton presidency. Not only for California. His claim is resonating in a powerful and honest way. California has contributed to the Federal budget; and this revenue (it is coming to light) has been treated like petty cash by Hillary already, with insufficient proper reinvestment to the state of California’s border protection (and other southern states that border Mexico) – and we know this in part because she does not publicly advocate this for us or share such political will. For obvious reason, this unsafe policy makes her very popular among Mexican leaders because it does not put any blame or culpability upon Mexico for illegal migration policies. Where much of our money has in place been given, is to Islamic militant groups in foreign countries. And we know now, that her past tenure has orchestrated this kind of neglect for the USA. This has resulted in the state of California choosing to increase taxation, despite great corporate wealth and despite trade deals that should provide for such safety reinvestment. We’ve been relying on ourselves and even financing Washington DC, while many of our every day citizens suffer. A Hillary Clinton presidency would ignore the basic safety concerns of Californians. Has she ever shown any sympathetic identification with the persons of the South-Western US states? Has she ever spoken out to promise measures that would counter such crimes as we endure daily up and down our state? At this point, even if she did, it would not be credible. Border officials by the way, have reported being ordered to “catch and release”, which is a scheme in which the illusion of border control is taking place. This has happened while she was at State Department… in lock step with our current president who made many visits in the past 8 years to the state of California to raise funds for the very party that is betraying us. Her failure, which would take over where Barack Obama would “hand off” duty to her if allowed by Americans to, underscores lack of care in understanding the southern border wall as being a component of safety and protection. This goes hand in hand with her would-be complete ineptitude at preventing continued illegal migration, armed groups and local crime increases, drug trafficking, and smuggling of all kinds. Sure, she could stay in her glass house, but maybe she’s crazy enough to wrongly assess that the impact of her policy failures would not reach her too? Once a wall is extended, and border control is respected, then it would be comprehensible to devise ways for legal residency, employment, and citizenship for people and families of good will (still respecting immigrants from other countries and numbers of persons limits). Hillary Clinton, advocates rewarding illegal immigration, encouraging it, and probably never intending to empower border regulation at all, ever. She has no logical approach, rather a strategy of a** kissing in exchange for easy votes of persons of certain ethnicity – Mexican. Common sense and justice however, does not permit dividing up voter loyalty according to race. She is perhaps hung up on the US history of the Mexican American war, in which Mexico never fully tolerated having to give up its beloved California territory. Well, I must say, California went through very much in history to incorporate with the USA, develop the land and settle in with the missionaries, mine for gold and develop industry: and it has remained one of the largest contributors in many respects, to the United States and world as we know it today. Yes, California has a history of exploit. But that does not mean that we give up our land and our protection. Especially not at the hand of our leaders. I suppose if Hillary had her way, she would continue to tarnish that legacy of ours, permit it to descend into chaos, and all for the benefit of her dramatic stage entry… would-be reign as ruler of the so-called once upon a time free world. No one who disregards the Constitution as much, no one who sells out principle to exploit Mexico’s past or even current resentments, and no one who cares less about it all unless it effects her salary and reputation, can ever know what it means to establish and maintain order and protection. If she contributed to Middle East turmoil (as the facts have born out), her policies would do the very same here, and very quickly, within the legal 4 years or 8 years of presidency. First, in “sanctuary cities”, and within 4 to eight years, all across America. We think violence within our borders is bad enough now? Pretty soon, if left under her command, we’d realize how short sighted and unprepared to fend off anything, her and her party cohorts are. A president who does not care about law and order, would establish martial law to suppress the very symptoms her policies would achieve. Is that what we want? No. Let’s not play games here. Relations with Mexico might be a bit strained here, but Hillary doesn’t know the first thing about beginning at step one. And, all the so-called advisors behind her, all the elite donations to her campaign, the illusion that a wall “does nothing” are not going to be able to make the headway that Mr. Trump will with the monumental support that he and Mike Pence have, and for good reason.