Soon, Californians will be in the voting booth again. And, this time around will be no less significant than any prior election in California’s history has been.<\/p>\n
While I would personally like to see Mrs. Carly F. campaign again in California, for the new governorship, it may not be her ambition and I have to respect that. I have a very good understanding that she gave it a very good effort once already. Also, I understand that she campaigned bravely in the presidential campaign last year; thereafter, she quite worthily finished not far behind our 45th in the polling. I don’t know where she stands on all the issues of concern to CA today, but she is dynamic, intelligent, and a conservative candidate. Any Republican is preferred over any democrat party candidate. On many of today’s most pressing social issues centered on reproductive protection and religious liberty, the Republicans of today will defend that.<\/p>\n
This new governor (whoever it will be) must be dynamic, and, must be conservative if we are to live in harmony with the rest of our nation. And, preferably should be a woman in my view. She must also be business-minded with understanding of the ethical challenges that California faces today. With an optimism for the future, she must be able to connect Californians to the rest of the nation, cooperate with the president (rather than seek to defy and sow discord) and be open with other countries also who partner in our businesses, always respecting their laws as well. A legislative history so male dominated, and so democrat party dominated, harms the vitality of our state which depends on partnership with the Trump administration today and into the future. The state governorship should not be in lack and left to the controversial attitudes of former leaders and their friends.<\/p>\n
So called “sanctuary city” status, is the most common grievance that Californians of democrats will try to defend at all cost I expect; and maybe without compromise and without self critique. Their party has made it clear immediately, that any candidate of their party must fulfill the prerequisite that they defy the country’s president. This particularly is so in method, as an expressed willing complete opposition to federal powers – and in particular our sitting federal administration. That aim is based on jealousy, hatred, and spite. But not only. Also, it is a basis for a deep divide between traditional morality and who knows what. Despite years of democratic party dominance in the federal Senate, three terms of a\u00a0 democrat governor in State politics, and eight years of former president Obama – the California democrats haven’t had enough time to drain all of our lifeblood? They announce that they want more of it as they begin to campaign this past week to dominate our state even further, and set out to oppose the rest of the country with the point of their contention based on one primary topic.<\/p>\n
Orange and Los Angeles counties, in California, are the biggest illegal immigrant sanctuary regions according to one source I quickly cite: http:\/\/www.ppic.org\/publication\/undocumented-immigrants-in-california\/
\n(The authors of the site, present some data about the controversial issue of undocumented
\nimmigration in California state).<\/p>\n
Generally, data from other sources show that illegal immigration in California is trending downward. It has not been without a long fight already for many years, teetering on the edge of
\nslanderous accusations that we opponents are racist. The accusations come now in a period of latency. Feeling the benefits of more honest and orderly adherence to the law, requires continued
\nvigilance in our conversations with people; and also the present and future federal court
\nrulings.<\/p>\n
Positive effects and solidarity in the rule of law, will require political behavior from our future conservative leaders, as well as lawful and measured restraint in the form of our own adherence to immigration law… serving the legal residents’ protections first. And, while federal laws are rightly subject to state challenges in many issues, there is a legal process for this conflict to be resolved. Not only by way of elections. Rather, by compromising attitudes by the winners of state and federal elections.<\/p>\n
Stating that those, like our president (who are willfully and actively stemming illegal immigration from Mexico and Latin America, or Africa; but also from other dangerous regional countries around the globe) are guilty of white “supremacy”, is clearly not fair. Democrats in California must be willing to explain how illegal immigration does not<\/em> endanger us. The truth is, that their defense is weak. No one can really deny that certain origins of geographic immigration-routes, per capita, are more dangerous to Americans than other routes and peoples in migration are. Some of this is because air travel has different complexity controls than land journeys or sea journeys. But, more than that, ethnic groups in various countries are different from ethnic groups of other geographic origin. Different religions pose different dangers respectively (if they seek to dominate our way of life), and some countries are subject because of their consideration of the USA as their enemy, while others not so much. This is why some travel bans are justified, and they make sense to safety for the US. The policy of EU countries does not necessarily correlate with the needed policy of US government for the USA, and visa versa.<\/p>\n While our country has made fantastic gains against ISIS in the middle east, (with Russian and US supreme military efficacy in Syria also) our federal government does know where that of it which remains, exists, in many of the global geographies. And, because of this knowledge, they are better equipped to craft domestic immigration policy accordingly, than a former mayor of any California city is. Unfortunately, there are Islamic militant groups here in our state of California already – and elsewhere in our nation, due to historical lax attitudes of some leaders; and the militant determination of foes. Yet, we must commend the law enforcement (and all leaders) who have done many great things continually – with political backing or lack of it. Democrat party members have recently more vocally and actively blocked federal immigration officials through court, for trying to do their job according to the law. It is a documented fact that law enforcement agents have testified those blocks to be true, to Republican party leaders. In many cases, there are reports of attempted pay-offs by socially “progressive” leaders (alleged) and documented, as shown on TV reports as well, to back away deportations and legal actions against illegal immigrants. This is bribery and corruption of law enforcement. The extent of this I cannot personally claim. But, i have been informed that during the Obama presidency, law enforcement in the south-west, has reported that their execution of the law was often hampered by their superiors (who bowed in to political pressures).<\/p>\n So, it makes even more sense that we craft immigration policy accordingly. That’s a major responsibility of our government. Some will argue that we cannot stem immigration based on race or religion. Wrong… we can, and we do. It’s when we stop doing that, that we have a more difficult time of preventing domestic terror. Especially, when that terror is religiously or politically motivated. If we ignore their motive, then we cannot solve the crimes or mitigate the future crimes. Things have to be identified as they are.<\/p>\n Not every illegal migrant person from every country, would seek to do us harm – true. But, we have to use our intellect when it comes to inviting and welcoming new citizens. Citizenship is dependent on applicants being eager to assimilate<\/em> in this our nation, and state, as such behavior depict embracing the dream; but our president has a right to issue travel bans and limit certain groups of people at times that are deemed fitting for such action, especially when and if the propensity for certain groups to do us harm exists. And, right now it does. Generally, demographics are not to be ignored ever. And, throughout America’s history, data has been utilized to shape choice in governance: we have had a self devised quota for refugee asylum seekers, quota for enterprising innovators, for particular ethnicity and groups, all to satisfy the direction the country collectively has chosen to take.There is nothing wrong with that.<\/p>\n Statistical analysis and comprehension of geopolitical realities are both needed, in order to maintain safety. And Mr. Trump has that data available to him and his branch of government. He is also honestly concerned about the nation’s survival, safety, and heritage. He makes that very clear and I believe that to be true of him.<\/p>\n I cannot simply walk into any house I want to, without knocking at the door first. If the door is opened to me, then I can begin to share time with the person and feel that I am welcome. Like it or not, our government helps us along by minimizing risks, and it protects our homes. Blockage of our ability to do that (control entry and exit), does not need to be tolerated by any of us.<\/p>\n With regard to California; the same is true. We’re a state that has much revenue. It’s been accumulated by innovation, tax collection, business, and the labor of immigrant populations from many lands. Ever since California’s first immigrant arrived after state incorporation, this has been true. Our state says it needs more revenue, while it squeeze out every penny from homeowners and consumers. It’s no wonder that the children of gen-x’ers and younger generations today, have legitimate worry about whether the job or business will be available to their own children and themselves, or whether we will be indebted to the state, the university system, and the hand-outs of social welfare to illegal immigrants… who are have been promised so-called “free” healthcare (which is unsustainable), free education (which is also unsustainable), and gosh knows what else! These promises, offered by some leftist elitist candidates for CA governor who want our vote, are endangering us all. They probably do wish to deliver on the promise of “free”. That is what is so Yes, the taxation will continue to rise. We could experience deflation or inflation, and increasing rates of taxation! Over-taxation, in the form of cleverly designed campaign tactic, clever and misleading propositions, initiatives, increased property taxation, out of control bond debt (government borrowing from citizens), fraudulent voting, exploit, and servitude. And, the justification for this is what? Well, if you disagree, then you are “insensitive to refugees”… “racist”. Excuse us? If I reach into your purse and take out your wallet to pull a few dollars out. And, then I say to you, “sorry, but America is the most generous land (I heard), and so I don’t think you’ll mind if I reach in for a freebie”. Whatever you have in your wallet is hard earned! And, then you scoff about it justifiably, as I name you a racist, for not letting me take your money. So, maybe those who disagree say that this example is a bit of a stretch, but they cannot deny that the state government (now democrat party controlled) is using our revenue to give and pay promises to anyone who votes in opposition to the very political direction that preserves sustainability. As someone who studied film-making, I can guarantee you, that business does not thrive on such a business model of shifting profits to hand-outs. The state cannot either. Eventually, the revenue goes dry as it is spent on socialism projects: interfering too actively in private lives and liberties; and all the leaders and their allies are virtually defenseless against the threat of Communism. It’s worth also adding the point that when industries such as Entertainment and Sports Industries, or Big-Pharma, or any other groups that lobbies Washington spend its revenues in political influence and clout in the state, over time, their industry’s survival becomes too intertwined in political campaigns. That endangers both democracy and business. Too much money sloshing around back and forth between private enterprise and government, is dangerous. Even in a capitalist model.<\/p>\n So, the so-called “progressive” politicians who want to push the sanctuary cities agenda: Is it hubris alone that motivates them? Or, has it been leftist policy, that seeks to give our land away? For an answer on that question: if we look at the concept of sanctuary cities- to break the law and provide escape for illegal immigrants defying the law, what other laws will be so blatantly disregarded later? That is why we need to explain the danger of doing so (as I do here) and also present some statistical information to support our argument.<\/p>\n Well, the facts are present in several categories. One: illegal immigration, is boosted by the promise of a better life for the immigrant – and achieved more so via falsified voter registration. Fortunately, many immigrants who have considered entering illegally, have been reconsidering doing so. To build a voter base that is sympathetic to illegal immigration, has required looping votes back into bad policy, in a state government interest of veering evermore left and lawless with each new falsified vote. Corruption in elective processes is a genuine problem. It’s actually a nation-wide systemic problem. According to “The Blaze’s” Chris Enloe: “A dozen California counties had more registered voters than eligible voters in the 2016 election.” That means that there were ineligible voters. And, Deroy Murdock from “National Review” quotes a lawyer as he writes, “there were enough over-registered voters to populate a ghost-state about the size of Connecticut.” Mr. Murdock explains that his calculation yielded 462 counties where the registration rate exceeded 100%. He continues to say, “There were 3,551,760 more people registered to vote than adult U.S. citizens who inhabit those counties.” So clearly, voter fraud is motivated (and embraced) by criminal minded politicians and political candidates – who know that they might get away with a win by all chosen means.<\/p>\n To further understand, when we recollect how former president Barack Obama won re-election by a razor thin number of voters (margin), we can correctly deduce that his win was vastly due to the lack of election integrity measures across the nation; but, more importantly in specific swing or crucial voting districts. And, this leads also to the dangers in district mapping as well, (tool of manipulation). It is a difficult procedure for the government to force a State’s secretary of state’s office to follow the election laws, ie. controls such as the compelling of states to clean up their registrations and data. One example of fraud, is the refusal of states to update notifications that a voter is actually deceased and whose name and identity are being cast as a vote under false, stolen, or illegal identity. That’s yet another example of where dead people’s identity can be stolen to count as a vote. It is also illegal that illegal immigrants are voting at all, in their own name or an “alias”! Their voices are being tabulated against the law. Democrat party politicians are in court defending the so called “right” to have inaccurate voter rolls in their state. So, is this phenomena only occurring in national elections? Of course, it is clearly not, or else courts would not have had to descend on this issue against states such as CA. And, despite these atrocious violations, our current president fortunately won the vote – giving more voice of support and mandate to him and his wildly popular policies among the domestic constituency. The “election interference” claims by the democrats at the hands of the Russians was also bogus, while all the voluminous evidences of democrat party wrong-doing in other areas of governance, is still only known to too few. This includes the foreign funding of the democratic party, which eats away at our Republic.<\/p>\n One has to wonder if only a blatant election fraud that has only the appearance<\/em> of credible wide margin victory, might be the method of choice in “doubling down” – a corrupt political maneuver and theft of election. According to “Investor’s Business Daily”, “the U.S. has 3.5 million more registered voters than live adults.” In California… our next election for governor and every future election… are they and will they be inaccurately won and lost?<\/p>\n With declines in illegal immigration, maybe more people will begin to adopt the sensible view that state democrats are not “where it’s at” anymore. It’s coming more and more down to a bout between liars and those who are more honest. State democrats who promise paradise to illegal Part of the democrat party psychology today, may be rooted in defiance of federal law, and our feeling of state superiority. Rather than make a coherent case for why “illegal sanctuary” is going to solve the disputes (which is pretty impossible); they (party leaders- not all party members perhaps), seem to find it just too difficult and humbling, to abide by conservative views. We’ll have to see if they are capable of compromising their agenda. They should consider this:<\/p>\n Those immigrants who have been lying to immigration law enforcement and the citizens, demonstrate a predictable unwillingness to assimilate in other ways. They refuse the process of integration, prefer to disregard the laws that are designed with good reasons. Or they are gripped with fear which is also not conducive. Is adhering to federal immigration law a failure of citizens to be welcoming and compassionate? No, it is not. People always must be turned away before they arrive. If the federal government did not turn people away, we would have more of an anarchistic state. And, it should also be said, that those who admit they’re breaking the law and then enter the path to legal residency or citizenship, should not need to worry about being treated less fairly than those who did it legally to begin with. The only real practical consequence of the lie (in a public policy perspective), would be a present delay as legal documentations process. So, those who did not lie, would become legal residents before the others. And those who did lie, will also still be given a chance to attain their legal status.<\/p>\n In this dangerous world, the federal government has the will of the country, to decide where immigrants come from. That is what is disconcerting about those in politics who disregard the laws, as they adopt “sanctuary city” policies unilaterally and defiantly. They’re not doing illegal immigrants any service by way of legal recognition (except for jobs, housing, and services at the expense of legal residents as I explained earlier). And, in effect, those politicians condone criminality… pushing the illegal person and family deeper into a hiding mentality. The politicians acting as “chicken hawks” – bring already vulnerable individuals and families into a fight with the rest of the country that has little moral authority. Some may say that lying about legal status is “OK”. That “the ends justify the means.” They might say also, that a compassionate society can overlook certain wills of the people. No. This is not so. A compassionate society turns away those who do not follow the guidelines of the federal law, so that it can fulfill the promises to its people who are already here and then others too. If that were not a true statement, then there would be no argument in support of any law and order; nor of prison systems at all either – which I must say often need major reforms and lessons in treating humanity better. Nor, would there be any moral defense for the purpose of punishment, discipline, hierarchy, or rule of law.<\/p>\n All those persons and families who are lucky to stay and who don’t do harm to the country, as they work to acquire lawful residency – are not only incredibly lucky; but, they are also demonstratively strong people who fulfill their end of the bargain… much like my own ancestors from Europe and Latin America did. I am the first native born American on the maternal side. Paternally, my dad became a natural born citizen… also eventually meeting my German (with Italian and other European lineage) mother, in California. Both, becoming teaching professionals and meeting on the job, my dad shares my view on illegal immigration despite being of Mexican lineage himself. For legal citizens, there are rights to job and everything else that is protected in our constitutions. Those who got jobs without legal status, have done so at risk of deportation. This is a large population of Californians who desire legitimate status and permanent residency here.<\/p>\n This state and federal Constitution, that many (not all democrats) seemingly defy today, is the very tool and mechanism of creating harmony between the diverse peoples of America. The constitutions are the moral fabric that provide frameworks in which compromises can be found. But, while non-citizens already cannot be turned away from workplace in the state of CA, we need to establish “e-verify” use now. Employers must be required to utilize this; and it must become federal and state law in my opinion: that upon certification only, the legal right to work and grant employment, are maintained. People who do not have residency and work permit, yet who work, are signing up for vulnerability and exploit. In worst case, they become black-market “property” or are trafficked without any rights to legal protections. We need to discourage that. Every person has a right to legal counsel at state expense. Legal protections for all, come with immigrant willfulness to ascribe to legal registrations in exchange for rights, privileges, and acknowledgments, that legal residency status strengthen. It not only benefits the legal resident, but also the orderliness required for national security.<\/p>\n The politicians who vow to protect these individuals illegally, are certainly doing these immigrants a huge disservice, and tarnishing their own political image. Whether these politicians are Mexican, other Latin American (or other origin), if politicians do not respect the law, then they set an example to new immigrants that law breaking is the only way to get ahead in America. We don’t want that message sent out, nor do we want that falsehood to penetrate the culture. Degradation of law is a problem. And, many laws are broken across the country. We cannot let people go that direction. That is precisely what is wrong and rogue. And, in this case (as is the case in many other laws), it is fortunate that a federal law can put a state law to shame.<\/p>\n It becomes clear that our president is feeling the pain and blame for doing what every president must – follow the law. Whatever objections and criticisms he faces from radicals in my state of It is not because we oppose legal<\/em> immigration that we have to turn many away, rather it is because we are the ones who are tasked with stemming the disorderly and illegal immigration that has caused problems… problems that others seem to disavow themselves from, cowardly. Californians need to appreciate that DACA was a temporary protection for those who were fearful Now, the state is tasked with appreciating gratefully the federal laws’ supremacy, as the state begin to make proposals on how it can create legal residency and legal work for those who have been here illegally for decades, but who do not<\/em> pose any security risks or engage repeatedly in other crime. Mr. Trump has expressed his compassion and understanding of the complexity that Californian illegal immigrant families undergo. Ultimately, the federal law enforcement has all the prevailing means to enforce all of this properly and the state of CA must comply – fortunately.<\/p>\n I thank our president for caring about keeping us safe. While many illegal immigrants pose no threat to citizens, the very policy that protects them, enables increased criminality. And, that effort to control this danger, requires geographic centered data. It also requires preemptive measures (ie. travel bans between some countries and ours) using the data that the government has. This is known as “intelligence”. That should never be undermined by court justices either, who have now 3 times blocked the geographic-based regions, where trouble is likely to begin. Our president is within his legal authority to press on with that. US immigration policies should be the best in the world. They should be fair, but according to our own preferences. We have that right as we consider who will be our next group of future citizens and\/or legal residents. The government is accountable for our safety.<\/p>\n Ethnicity is not the basis for turning illegal immigrants away. If suddenly French, or Canadian, or German, or Islamic populations came to our country illegally, I would still have some aversion and legitimate concerns that most Americans do today also, regarding terrorism and crime. That is because today, many of those ethnic populations (countries) are comprised of foreigners who would seek to harm the USA if they were here. A huge risk, has been an influx of radical<\/em> Muslims, because they have called for “jihad” (holy-war) against Christians. Our very own compassionate Catholic Church has been concerned about such genocidal instances against Christians in many countries. These victims feel completely ignored by the most powerful countries of the world. Some terrorists have acted in a way unlike any more peaceful ethnicity in the US has; unlike the Irish, the Germans, the Scandinavians and others. Illegal immigration (of any ethnic group), is a real cause for concern for government; and it must continue to be stemmed where it occurs. Latin American migration has been of concern, due to the criminality in that region, and the proximity of Mexico. Our border wall is integral to our safety. And, there is no denying that drug lords and gangs of Mexican origin, have for too long plagued our California, forcing police to work exceptionally hard. Tax-payers are the only support that these brave men and women of law are financed through. On so many occasions, smuggled cocaine routes, weapons smuggling, and the marijuana trade, have been blocked and mitigated by our state. And, there are democrats and republicans alike who deserve credit for that. But who denies that these successes are dependent on Republican policies? The democrats who call themselves “progressives”.<\/p>\n Now that the president’s emergency travel bans (which he promised his constituency in the federal election) are struck down, perhaps leftists who promise “the world” to anyone who comes, will come to understand that we try to take the measures needed, in order to prevent events like nine-eleven 2001. And, that is with good reason and justification. That is not supremacy or unworthy nationalism speaking. It is responsibility. If our political opponents choose to close their eyes, plug their ears, and worse… make threats, we can be sure that trouble would follow us and them alike. So it is time to work together under Republican leadership. Long live conservatism!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Soon, Californians will be in the voting booth again. And, this time around will be no less significant than any prior election in California’s history has been. While I would personally like to see Mrs. Carly F. campaign again in …<\/span> Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-and-politics","category-us-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2111"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2131,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2111\/revisions\/2131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.film-shorts.tv\/wpress.cfonseca160\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nconcerning, because, free is free right? Only… it’s not free to the person paying the price. And, then the politicians hint today at their intention to increase this aim… already suggesting to the country that we need to secede from the country. Do we really need to revisit the civil war, when wealthy state governments wished to split off from the centralized power? No! Do California democrats think of themselves as the rebel south, exploiting some and rewarding others? And, will it be the recipients of “free” who lose out – rather than those who are law-abiding and responsible people? It’s time to speak out at the ballot box to stop this emerging trend dead in its tracks!<\/p>\n
\nIs the financial war-chest built up on the backs of law abiding and law breaker residents alike, so that CA state legislators can fight the federal laws that we as a state should<\/em> actually want and need, were it not for the state government defying the federal controls?<\/p>\n
\nimmigrants at the expense of otherwise lawful procedure and safety… is that what we want? No!<\/p>\n
\nCalifornia, let it be known that a “path to citizenship” can best be put into law only after the influx of illegal immigration is stemmed. Constitutional law is critical to finding the solutions. And, that has been enabling conversations and breathing room, for instituting legal pathways for those who came illegally but do not get deported. Citizenship, or at least legal residency and legal work permits can be given. Republicans have mostly opposed DACA not because we are a cruel group of people; rather because it is not the long term solution. We had to and have to turn many away before we can legalize the lucky ones who deserve a second chance to amend their status. And that has been the success so far.<\/p>\n
\nof deportation, while illegal immigration was trending downward. We’re in better position to block entry and yet contract with others who are still\/already here without engaging in further crimes beyond the immigration crime.<\/p>\n