http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39957358

This supposed “outsider”, is actually a biased leader, due to his extensive lengthy term within FBI. Would he care to comment on all the past years of foreign and domestic meddling that funded the DNC? Such hypcricy by those who did not seek prosecution against Hillary and Soros group of people, is wasting our money. (Our president showed Hillary great mercy, and now he’s being stymied).

Today, first, the allegations aimed at Russia are still unsubstantive (no proof for many weeks, all talk). Second, how about every American politician who speaks for pay in a foreign country (speech), be accused and probed, for trying to “tip elections” there in those nations? Such nation building has been orchestrated for decades; and speech givers have profited as they influence in other countries according to their political agenda and aims. They fund universities. They fund media. Who else “tips elections”? I do. That’s called free speech. It’s protected under our Constitution… look it up. Are we to have every citizen and journalist who writes opinion be accused of “tipping elections”? Should they all be punished for wrong doing too? And, every journalist who writes op-ed propaganda in their own country? And, every political party chairperson, pollster, campaigner, and activist for trying to “interfere” with their own democracy and “tip election”? And, in the USA, should political parties refuse all monetary donations? Let’s be real, prior administrations (sitting government) ALSO do not over-rule the election and successors. Who’s in charge here exactly? We are! We voted! We’re in charge!

If the losers had won in 2016, would there be a “probe” today, into “tipping an election” in their favor? Very unlikely. This hunt is aimed at puffing up the influence of the deep state, in their discomfort with change. New leadership style, worries the establishment.

Can we get on with business please, instead of wasting tax dollars on “investigating” people other than those persons who rightly should be implicated… those who Judicial Watch has already rightly implicated and brought to court? Can we have governing, that is not stymied by vain investigations that should be instead better directed at the DNC? Can we give the Republicans the needed space to tackle illegal immigration that has tainted free and fair elections? Yes, we won despite those irregularities. That should be clear indication of the will of the people. Against all expectations, we have won.

The intelligence community has a responsibility to serve the sitting president and to separate its politics, if it should have differences with him among its ranks, from the preceding legitimate election outcome. If the Attorney General orders to prosecute political misdeeds, it should do so beginning with the DNC – which has mountains of evidence of wrongdoing during the former two presidential terms and well before that time. It’s no wonder “we” look immature.